Weekender -- The Reasons behind '50 Reasons'

Posted by Unknown Sabtu, 30 Agustus 2008 0 komentar

Perhaps a country’s ability to take a take a punch, shrug off perceived insults and face up to criticism squarely is one of the first signs that a nation had achieved maturity and its people their place at the table of great nations.

Not yet China.

Good fortune, and a marvellous relationship with the English books editor at Random House Kodansha in Tokyo was the reason ‘Fault Lines On The Face Of China: 50 Reasons Why China May Never be Great’ was first published in Japan, a country still felt by most Chinese as its greatest enemy.

To actually manufacture an insult to the motherland and the people of China by intentionally publishing our work first in Japan is far beyond our ability and actually bestows upon us a deviousness that is – well – insulting.

We have joined rather good company. Companies such as Starbucks, Deloitte Touche, Toyota and many others have all been tarred with the ‘insulters of China’ brush of shame, usually applied by the government, but sometimes also fostered by highly educated Chinese experts who should have better things to do.

Why?

The authors of ‘Fault Lines On The Face of China: 50 Reasons Why China May Never Be Great,’ David Marriott and Karl Lacroix, feel the answer harkens back to the opening statement of this piece.

Maturity and subsequent greatness -- both of which China has yet to achieve.

Our book does not attack China. Our book is a warning cry to the Chinese people that failure to achieve greatness is the most likely possibility IF the motherland fails to open its eyes, ears, and heart to its problems....now.

The book details 50. We discovered dozens more. China plays a dangerous game turning one eye towards its obvious successes, while keeping the other eye blind to its failures.

At fault is certainly the government, but more so the very people, the citizens who readily perceive supposed insults but fail to recognize dangerous decay within their society. The Communist Government builds a paper tiger while what the people of China should demand and well-deserve is a real blood and guts dragon.

‘Things are getting better’ or ‘things are changing’ are the standard phrases that must be included within every ‘critical’ article published in the Western Press. Why? Balance. The authors of such articles and indeed the journals publishing them want to be seen as balanced, fair, and moderating.

In FAULT LINES there is no balance. No apologies. No self appointed moderation. In FAULT LINES there are just problems, difficulties, 50 failures that need attention desperately. The authors feel ‘balance’ is a wasted journalistic emotion.

But for this reason the authors have yet to capture an English publishing contract. Western editors who have zero China experience, but an abundance of balancing ability claim it is ‘too critical.’ Their attitude is that the authors’ combined 25 years of China life means nothing, without ‘balance’

For the authors, however, our experience means a unique ability to define, illustrate and detail at least 50 faults within China today, faults that run concurrently, destructively holding back the greatest society to ever have a chance to join man’s march into the future.

For the authors David Marriott and Karl Lacroix, our attitude means loving China enough to shout out a warning, to try to illustrate the plain facts and to tell the truth. The truth as we know it, without false ‘balance.’

While we did write the book with a Western audience in mind, we are very keen that Chinese people should be able to read it too. It would be totally wrong to say we wrote the book for Western people but not for Chinese people.

One of the reasons we have been using the ‘ChinaBounder’ blog as a vehicle to discuss our book is to help generate awareness of it among a wider audience. But we are also very keen that Chinese people should be able to get an idea of the topic of the book. There is no way ‘Fault Lines’ could ever be published in China, and this is our only route to raising the issues we discuss with the people of China.

We are happy to discuss our book with anyone who wishes to comment at 50faultlines@gmail.com

Writing the book took over one year, not including thousands of hours of research and hundreds of interviews, ‘Fault Lines’ was carefully and meticulously researched, written and footnoted.

We have made a great deal of use of Chinese media sources. Though the Chinese media is carefully controlled by the government, there is a still a huge amount of valuable information to be gained from it – not just in plentiful facts and figures, but also in attitudes, assumptions and beliefs about what China ‘is.’

We hoped to avoid the charge that we were relying on ‘biased’ Western data and opinion sources by proving each of the 50 Faults with information gleaned from Chinese citizens and media sources. However, for topics such as Tibet and Xinjiang, we did make wider use of international sources, since there is simply no objective reporting on these issues in China.

Currently we are working through ideas for several fact-based novels. All our China themed work must be thoroughly researched, whether fiction or non-fiction. Only the ChinaBounder character takes liberties with reality, but even behind his remarks lurks an element of truth often ignored by the character’s detractors.

Black comedy, satire and risqué humour is not allowed within China when directed towards government leaders and institutions. Sadly most Chinese readers miss the point when trying to digest the comments made on the infamous blog. In more open and perhaps democratic societies, political satire is seen as a safety valve, a way for citizens to jab politicians, and themselves in the ribs to say ‘Hey! Don’t forget, we are watching you.’

Within the book’s title, ‘Fault Lines On The Face of China: 50 Reasons Why China May Never Be Great,’ there is a concession, at least within the Japanese edition. We anguished for weeks over the two words ‘may’ and ‘will.’ The word ‘will’ seemed much more negative, more certain and certainly too strongly opinionated against the future. The word ‘will’ seemed to doom China.

In the end we chose the word ‘may’ simply because our work ‘Fault Lines On The Face of China: 50 Reasons Why China May Never Be Great’ is a warning, and when giving notice to a people and a country there must be hope.

The last chapter or ‘reason’, number 50, is the most important for China to pay heed to. Entitled ‘The Voice of China’ we ask for the reason that China will give for its existence to the rest of the world. How will China motivate the world? Another great consumer society, preyed upon by megacorporations is not needed. Nor is a ‘harmonious’ society dictated to on a daily basis by an archaic political system.

We ask China to show the world the way into the future, for surely we and the rest of the world have yet to find an answer. Then China will not only be great - it will be the greatest nation of all time

Karl Lacroix Biography:

Karl Lacroix’s arrival in China in the summer of 1992 was for him a dream come true.

Intoxicated as a young boy on the spirit of adventure, Karl found the warmth of the muggy night air of Shanghai filled his need for a ‘new’ land.

In the early nineties, indeed China was the new ‘promised land.’

Karl’s family, directed by the Canadian army, had pulled up stakes and moved across oceans many times, instilling within Karl at a young age a sense of wanderlust that only China has really satiated. An English-born mother and an American-born father gave impetus to a sense of internationalism that formed his character.

Writing came to Karl at an early age, acting as a cub reporter for a local city newspaper in Ontario, Canada. Words became important, not because they were rewarded, but because they generated human reaction.

Now in his late 50s, Karl’s power of observation and experience , combined with a liberal viewpoint, has directed him to voice his ‘protest’ over China’s failure to seek a higher calling than that of being the largest consumer market in the history of the world.

Karl Lacroix expects to live out his life in the most fascinating and compelling area of the world - Asia.


David Marriott Biography:

David Marriott is a collector of fine wines and a voracious reader of books that never leave once they are acquired. The occasional bottle of wine however, disappears without remorse, its preservation within the collection be damned.

His attendance at Oxbridge almost convinced him that a life of academia was his until an opportunity arose that could not be denied – China.

Working as an editor, developing 'free journalism' within a state owned newspaper, for two years David found that in China 'free' means exactly what the government wants it to mean.

Pursuing the family journalism heritage gave David a sense of purpose which was unfortunately limited by rules, regulations and interpretations that were less than logical.

A chance encounter and a quick discussion of a book project provided a different direction and a 'Brotherhood of China' relationship with Karl Lacroix.

David, now in his late thirties, is an avid linguist and has managed to learn to speak, read and write enough Chinese to avert the potentially disastrous situations both Karl and David seem to find themselves occasionally.

David Marriott's life will continue within Asia, so deep has the influence of his present life in China been. The Brotherhood of China has tales to reveal and truths to expose on a journey that will continue book after book.


-The comments and material above have been prepared by Karl Lacroix.

Please feel free to contact us with any more questions or expansions on the ideas that have presented.





Baca Selengkapnya ....

Reason Number 30 - The Fallibility of Chinese Characters

Posted by Unknown Kamis, 28 Agustus 2008 0 komentar
‘Fault Lines On The Face Of China: 50 Reasons Why China May Never Be Great’ - Excerpt 57
“The Chinese definition of literacy is the ability to read and write at least 1500 Chinese characters. In 1949, when ‘New China’ was founded, the illiteracy rate was more than 80%. By 1992, 22.3% of adults in China were illiterate. Ten years later, that proportion had dropped to 8.72%.

While 8.72% seems relatively small, that translates into a total of 85 million illiterate people in China at the beginning of this century. Twenty million of them were between the age of 15 and 50, with 70% of the total number of illiterate people being women.

Despite China’s huge recent economic expansion and the country’s trillion-dollar plus foreign reserves, the total amount of money allocated per year since 2000 to fight and eliminate illiteracy among 85 million people was just eight million yuan (US$1.03 million). Education was worth a paltry 0.07 yuan per person, an amount that would certainly not buy a book of lessons, nor even a pencil or one single sheet of paper to write on.

Small wonder then that by 2007 the number of illiterate people had not dropped -- it had risen. Since official figures were released after China’s last census in 2000, giving a base of 85 million illiterate people, China has experienced an increase in illiteracy equal to the entire population of Canada -- 30 million people – becoming unable to read or write. Today, 116 million people are unable to meet China’s definition of literacy.”


Think about that statistic carefully. Since 2000, there has been an increase in illiteracy in China of thirty million people. China, with its vast wealth and its billions to waste on Olympics and armies and men in space. Can’t even fix the most basic, fundamental problems.

What does that say about the ‘progress’ of China?

‘Fault Lines On The Face Of China: 50 Reasons Why China May Never Be Great’ - Excerpt 58
“Although not all would do so, each and every citizen of these 116 million people is denied the opportunity to unleash their potential, both for self and country, simply through the malaise of illiteracy. In order to put the size of these figures into perspective, in the year 2000, 11.3% of all illiterate people on the planet lived in China. Incredibly, by 2005, that total had risen to 15%.

A full 40% of Chinese people cannot speak Mandarin and, once again, it is the countryside population rather than the city elite who suffer. The isolating factor of speaking only your own dialect in a country of 1.3 billion people fractures the very nationhood of China. This mosaic of language prevents the government from giving a clear message of unity to all citizens. In addition, the inability to speak a common language, combined with the inability to read and write, dooms China’s poor citizens to a life of very few opportunities.”

Baca Selengkapnya ....

Reason Number 29 - Blue China Crime

Posted by Unknown Rabu, 27 Agustus 2008 0 komentar
‘Fault Lines On The Face Of China: 50 Reasons Why China May Never Be Great’ - Excerpt 55
"Shanghai is remarkably safe. The Shanghainese are still the ‘special ones’ of China. They still get the added respect from criminal elements from other parts of China that affords them an additional layer of protection, something the folks in booming cities like Shenzhen across from Hong Kong no longer have. In Shenzhen if they want your purse but you hang onto it too tightly, they might just cut your arm off.

But even as residents here in Shanghai for over 20 years, the authors have not been touched by it, or even really seen it. Sure, a pick pocketed wallet and a pinched mobile, both lost more from carelessness than to an exercise of someone’s criminal ability. But real crime? Best to watch the late night local TV news to see that.

But the bad guys are coming sure enough. And the young ones are in training.

Blue (collar) China Crime forms the most fearful element of the 4th Army of Instability. In the end, the White and Red elements of the 4th Army may cause more financial long term harm, but it is the physical nature of the Blue Army that paralyzes most people with fear."

Shanghai is indeed a point of relative calm in China. Rich city, there is less of the desperate crime of the provinces. Closest I ever came to crime was getting my pocket picked, and pretty ineptly at that. I was with Gloria, taking her to the Shanghai railway station to see her off on her journey back home at Lunar New Year. The crowds were intense, as always, but I was paying a modicum of attention and I felt a hand slide into my pocket. I grabbed that hand, and with it a youngish boy of 14 or 15 or so. And, having caught him, had little idea of what to do with him. But Gloria was in a hurry to get her train, and urged me to let him go. That’s what I’d have done anyhow, I guess, for I would not leave him to the care of the coppers and, besides, I am sure he had few options but to be a pickpocket, China being what it is.

But often I think if China had the crazy level of gun ownership of the United States, Shanghai crime would be a different story. You only have to look at the city’s drivers to see that – the anger, the mad, enraged, passionate anger that most all drivers show a dozen times a day is evidence enough; these are guys who, armed, would leap from their cars and shoot each other dead over the most trivial incident.

‘Fault Lines On The Face Of China: 50 Reasons Why China May Never Be Great’ - Excerpt 56
"China, a country that often professes its modesty, its calmness, has its own demons to slay. Rapidly following the path of developed countries, China’s list of serial and mass killers grows ominously.

In southwestern Guizhou Province in November 2006, a magistrate, Wen Jiangang, his wife, his son, his sister-in-law, his mother-in-law and even his nursery maid were all murdered. Police rapidly arrested 42-year-old Cao Hui, announcing he had murdered Wen and his family purely for money. Yet other swirling rumors suggested that since Wen had been in charge of closing down illegal mines in the area, it might have been resentful mine owners who arranged his killing. The same month that Wen was killed also saw the murder of a restaurant owner and three of his relatives in Dongguan city in Guangdong Province.

The month after, December 2006, saw the murder of a family of five in southern Guangdong Province’s Foshan city. Also in December 2006, another magistrate, Chen Yiming, was murdered along with his wife, seven-year-old grandson and housemaid in northwest Gansu Province. Another family of six was murdered in southern Guangdong Province in May 2007. After taking the contents of the safe the burglars killed everyone present, including four children, the youngest of whom was four years old.

According to Ministry of Public Security spokesman Yu Xinmin, mass killings in 2006 were 63% lower than in 2005. In the same report, a professor at the Chinese People’s Public Security University, Li Meijin, said that 'In a big country such as China, 10 mass murders a year is relatively low.'

With the acceptance of such figures, does this mean that mass-murder is a tradition in China?"



Baca Selengkapnya ....

Reason Number 28 - A Traditional Feast of Cruelty

Posted by Unknown Selasa, 26 Agustus 2008 0 komentar
‘Fault Lines On The Face Of China: 50 Reasons Why China May Never Be Great’ - Excerpt 53
“Cruelty to animals has a long history in China. ‘Rich people in ancient times used to put live ducks onto hot iron plates and the ducks end up dancing themselves to death. The diners then eat the meat on the ducks’ feet because it was said to be much more delicious than the meat of ducks cooked in the ordinary way’ said media.

China has many cruelly-prepared dishes. One is called ‘the three squeaks.’ This dish consists of live baby mice, and its name comes from the fact they squeak first when picked up by the diner’s chopsticks, second when dipped in sauce, and third when placed in the mouth and bitten.

Media also noted that while some people were kinder to animals, this could ‘stem from a fear of being punished if animals are treated badly’ because ‘Buddhism encourages people not to eat animals since … after death, people may become animals themselves.’ It is fear of religious retribution that may dictate positive treatment of animals rather than the natural expression of kindness itself."

Among the few people still bothering to comment on this blog there’s a bit of a debate going on about the merits of TCM – traditional Chinese medicine.

As a rationalist I no more believe in most of TCM than I believe in other equally preposterous fairy tales such as Jesus and Allah. Sure, TCM has its testable benefits, but only insofar as its shamanistic recipes coincide with the proven benefits of many types of plant. The bulk of it is sheer nonsense, from yin and yang to acupuncture.

This is not to deny it can be effective – for what TCM most does is soothe the mind of those who believe in it – and if the mind is convinced, the body often can be. That’s why there is such a vast army of idiots who believe in homeopathy and crystal healing and aromatherapy and so on.

But these ‘medicines’ are nothing more than placebos – in the case of acupuncture, for example, an experiment last year found that “There was no statistically significant difference between proper, genuine acupuncture and fake, ‘bung a needle in, anywhere you fancy, with a bit of theatrical ceremony’ acupuncture.”

The problem with TCM is that it sees nature as an allegory. It imposes a very human interpretation on the world, and suggests that the way ‘we’ see the world is how the world really is. In short – the essence, the very theory and core of TCM is ignorant and arrogant.

Take the case of tiger bone. Tiger bone – indeed all parts of the tiger – are highly prized by TCM since they are held to endow great strength on those who ingest them. This is because, from a human perspective, the tiger is a signifier of power and prowess; it is an animal of grace, speed and deadliness.

TCM sees the tiger as an answer; in fact it is just an equation. The tiger is made out of the same stuff as any other animal, and it is the inescapable Darwinian response to its environment. It is merely a staging post in the grand flow of evolution. But TCM views it as a finished, almost designed product; TCM sees it as an embodiment rather than a process.

But nature is not an allegory; eating the tiger does not make us strong any more than eating the mole makes us miners. To see animals as signifiers is to misunderstand nature and our place in it. And that is why TCM has done so much damage to the natural world, driving the tiger and the rhino close to extinction. It is also why China’s attitude to the animal world (all parts of it save small fluffy dogs) is so monstrously cruel, stuck back where the West was in the age of bear-baiting and cock fights.

‘Fault Lines On The Face Of China: 50 Reasons Why China May Never Be Great’ - Excerpt 54
“China does have laws to protect its endangered species, though like so many laws in the country they carry little judiciary weight, the result of which leaves rare animals hunted for food in an age of grocery stores and supermarkets.

A nationwide campaign called Spring Thunder in 2003 saw Chinese police inspect nearly 16,000 animal fairs and 67,800 hotels and restaurants across the county. During the inspection, which lasted just nine days, 838,500 endangered animals were confiscated, saved from China’s kitchens. About 45,000 of them were wildlife with first-class state protection.

In 2007, demand for wild and exotic animals on the dinner table was still high. Thirteen people were sentenced to up to 14 years in prison after they were found guilty of illegally buying and selling thousands of state-protected wild animals in the largest wild animal trade case the country had seen, said media. One man, Ma Weihu, illegally bought about 900 owls, a Grade-II state protected animal, to sell to restaurants in southern Guangdong Province.

While China’s laws on endangered species are clearly ineffectual, the country also does not have a single law ruling against animal cruelty. None. ‘(Animal abuse) cannot be tackled with public opinion or moral pressure, it’s time for legislation,’ said Mang Ping, assistant professor with the Central Socialist Academy, and a long-time advocate for animal rights in China.”


Baca Selengkapnya ....

Reason Number 27 - The Chinese ‘Gold’ Push

Posted by Unknown Senin, 25 Agustus 2008 0 komentar
‘Fault Lines On The Face Of China: 50 Reasons Why China May Never Be Great’ - Excerpt 51
“Coming from countries like Canada and Britain, the authors have the ability to appreciate coming second or third, even the necessity of it. There is true glory in silver and bronze.

Not if you are a citizen of China. Unless you achieve gold medal ranking, your accomplishments will disappear along with hundreds of thousands of other second and third place finishers. On Chinese television, if you win on a live broadcast, you are certain to be replayed over and over. If you or your team loses, a terse three sentences on the evening’s sports program will be all the glory you will receive.

An example of the obsession with coming first was seen after the 2004 Athens Olympics, when only gold-medal winners from mainland China were allowed the grace of celebrating their achievements in front of politicians and the public in Hong Kong. Silver and bronze medal winners had to be content with the warmth of family congratulations at home, out of the limelight. Only mere fractions of distance and milliseconds of time separate winners from losers. But in China the gulf between winners and loser is physical, spiritual, and huge.”

‘…the ability to appreciate coming second or third’ – or perhaps even fourth, which is where ‘we,’ the British, came in the Olympics. ‘We’ are of course celebrating, since though we had hoped to retain the third place slot we had held for much of the games, we were content to end up fourth. Best result in a century and so on.

But what is ‘we’? I am British, and I do feel a certain sense of pleasure that Britain has done so well at the Olympics. And I could get pugnacious about it, could point out that with ‘our’ population base, being 60 million or so, we won one gold per 3.15 million people, and that China, with its base of 1.6 billion, won one gold per 31 million. Does that make Britain ten times better than China?

Yet in the end I cannot really feel much sense of personal pride. I honor the achievement of the British athletes, just like I honor the victories of the Chinese athletes. But it does not really have anything to say about what Britain is, or how the world should view the nation. These victories are ultimately just personal events.

The cult of personal victory is fine; but the idea of national victory is dangerous and threatening. And it leads to great sacrifices, as so many of China’s almost-made-it athletes know. The pressure to win, to win gold, finally does more harm than good.


‘Fault Lines On The Face Of China: 50 Reasons Why China May Never Be Great’ - Excerpt 52
“For China, coming first in major international competitions is almost a matter of life and death, and is comparable to a major military campaign. Liu Peng, President of the Chinese Olympic Committee, said in early 2007 that “Battle preparations for the 2008 Olympic Games are in a grave state. To the outside, we must display humble troops and keep a low profile, but inwardly we must plant grand ambition to scale great heights, and there can be absolutely no slackening.” Would words of actual war be any less bombastic? Would the call to arms be any less spiritually demanding?

The pursuit of titles is so dominant that it restricts the personal freedom of athletes. In late 2006 Liu Peng announced ‘In order to prepare for the 2008 Beijing Olympics, our country’s athletes, including celebrity athletes, are banned from participating in all kinds of social activities.’ In typical Chinese fashion, what was meant by “social activities” was not specified. And while media suggested the ruling was primarily aimed at sports stars who gave commercial endorsements to products, the vaguely worded nature of the statement meant it could be used to control athletes in the widest possible range of ways.

In China, trying counts for very little. All that matters is success, and the concept of the ‘noble failure’ is virtually non-existent. The ‘success at all costs’ attitude is at the root of many other social phenomena observable in China today. It is the reason behind the stock market frenzy, and the reason behind the fact that manufacturers are willing to sell low quality or dangerous goods just so that they can close the deal. It underlies China’s conspicuous consumption, and it explains why students are expected to seek financial success over personal satisfaction – and why the student who wants to be an artist or musician faces social derision.”


Baca Selengkapnya ....

Reason Number 26 - The Migrant School of Revolution

Posted by Unknown Minggu, 24 Agustus 2008 0 komentar

‘Fault Lines On The Face Of China: 50 Reasons Why China May Never Be Great’ - Excerpt 49
“China’s migrants have built the factories and office blocks that support the country’s rise to economic supremacy. They have built roads, rail, docks and airports that allow it to import and transport the millions of tons of raw ingredients it needs and export the billions of dollars of finished goods it produces. And most of this has been done by sweat and muscle power rather than by hi-tech machinery. Spade and sinew are the most common sights on China’s construction projects, often without labor-saving hydraulic equipment.

China’s migrants also work in the kitchens of the cities, providing meals for socialites and office workers that they could not themselves afford. They clean the houses of the richer city elite. Migrants are available for any job beneath the social and economic standard of the city’s better-educated residents.

Life has always been hard for such people in China – so much so that their way of existence has entered the very language. The English word ‘coolie’ is taken from the Chinese words ‘ku li,’ meaning ‘bitter strength,’ a testament to how many centuries China’s poor have labored for China’s rich. Such language and such attitudes reinforce the ostracization of these city-builders to a point where they feel they live in one country while building another.

Their numbers continue to grow, and as they come to the clear realization that they will never share in the good life enjoyed by the millions of city dwellers, China’s migrant workers will form the 3rd Army of Instability.”

So, goodbye to the Olympics for another four years. It was about what I expected – a mix of glitzy show, Chinese powerhouse athlete success, and lies and dissimulation.

The last two weeks cost the Chinese people more than forty billion US dollars. Was it worth it, guys, when so many of your nation still struggle to attain even the most basic necessities of life?

Yeah, a pretty stunning medal tally. Soon as China got the games I knew they’d get the most medals. No two ways about it – all those years to round up promising young children and put them in the concentration camps of modern Chinese sport. For China’s athletes, life is a regime of the most arduous physical exercise, with no love, no care, no education. There is just one goal – to be the best. If you’re not the best you’re cast aside like trash. Doesn’t matter what you’ve achieved – fail, and you’re fucked. Look at Liu Xiang. Where was he in the closing ceremony? Where was the respect and honor for him?

I admire and respect China’s athletes. They are glorious. But the world should know that the athletes who performed so wonderfully over the course of the games are just a tiny layer on top of a huge mound of sacrificed bodies, the bodies of the tens and tens of thousands who did not make the grade -- who gave everything and got nothing.

That’s how it is in China, from the children to the aged. From the young girl who practiced to sing in the opening ceremony, tossed aside because she was not cute enough, to the 200 million migrant workers who face contempt and hardship every single day, the message China gives is clear -- Be perfect or fuck off.

China calls itself a socialist country. And the impulse behind socialism – the sense of equality – is indeed noble. But China is a more rapacious and brutal nation than any capitalist country on the planet. Greed and selfishness, that’s the core of life in China today. And so the ‘socialist’ claim is a monstrous crock of bullshit.

But what is to be expected from China when the very name of the nation is a lie?

China – ‘The People’s Republic of China’ – as if the people owned anything – as if they were in charge! China is run by the crooks and thieves of the party and the few millions of citizens who have managed to make some money trading on the misery of the poor.

Bring on the uprising of the third army, that’s what I say.

‘Fault Lines On The Face Of China: 50 Reasons Why China May Never Be Great’ - Excerpt 50
“A major survey undertaken by China’s Ministry of Labor and Social Security, which covered 2.84 million migrant workers across 19,000 enterprises in 40 cities, found that 79.2% of workers listed their greatest concern as income and nearly 40% talked about lack of social insurance. Just over 25% said unpaid wages were a major concern. Of those who had not been paid on time, said the survey (without giving the precise number of unpaid workers) the average amount owed was 2,100 yuan (US$270).

Regardless of the lack of a precise number of unpaid workers, fully one in four migrant workers has not been paid, fears they will not be paid, or has reservations about the truth behind the company that they work for and the ability of the government to enforce the retrieval of the funds should they be withheld.

Article 36 of China’s 1995 Labor Law says “The State shall practice a working hour system wherein laborers shall work for no more than eight hours a day and no more than 44 hours a week on the average.” Such words indicate a labor utopia which is not to this day enjoyed by any migrant. A survey by the Chinese Academy of Sciences in June 2007 found that most migrant workers received no payment for overtime, and that two thirds of them had no opportunity to negotiate wages. It also found that more than 30% of migrant workers injured in industrial accidents received absolutely no compensation.”




Baca Selengkapnya ....

Top 10 Possible Reasons Why Liu Xiang Walked Away

Posted by Unknown Kamis, 21 Agustus 2008 0 komentar

Guest Post by Karl Lacroix

1. Liu was the only athlete in the history of sports with 1.3 BILLION coaches. Everybody in China knew what Liu should do, but only he knew what he COULD do.

2. Liu was and will forever be a ‘one hit’ athletic wonder. A lot of athletes are like that. He should have walked away after the world record was set. Chinese people were shocked that he, an Asian, had beaten the clock in basically a Western competition. The shock was right. He will never do it again.

3. The Chinese forgot that he was a hero of the last Olympics, not the 2008 Olympics. Hero status today is something each athlete MUST earn and you are nothing till you do. Who remembers who won what in 1996 or 2000? The voracious appetite for heroes prevalent throughout the world is damn near a fever pitch in China. Does anyone in China care who the No.2 Chinese 110m hurdles runner is? Nobody in the rest of the world does either, Eat ‘em up and spit ‘em out. (Shi Dongpeng by the way).

4. Liu failed because he spent too much time chasing kangaroos in TV commercials in China. Hell, even Aussie runners don’t chase kangaroos.

5. Liu had too much money to carry on his back each time he ran a race...bundles of it strapped on his back. And the biggest currency note in China is only worth 100 rmb. He was in effect a race horse with a huge handicap under his saddle. Alas now he will only be able to spend it. (Crocodile tears all around...).

6. No sex! Liu had bad skin, obviously meaning he was not getting laid. Sex relaxes the muscles. He looked so tight the night he walked away, like he had a terminal case of blue balls. (Now I can hear my Chinese readers saying ‘Blue balls?’- - never mind).

7. Too much sex! Liu was a pretty boy. Maybe he had too many girls sapping his strength. On the other hand maybe he had too many gay lovers slapping him silly.

8. Liu knew the Cuban was going to win. Athletes in any TOP sport know if they will get beaten or not. The great ones find another way to win, usually with heart. Being not so great....Liu took the shower (read ‘easy’) road.

9. The Communist government told him to quit. Why? Well, right now, can you name any Chinese superstar (with a moniker as recognizable as Liu Xiang) who has won gold at this Olympics in a heroic way? Nope. So the government views the gold medal count as a victory for communism.....individuals not wanted. The leaders of China know that the record book will show that the 2008 medal haul by China will be forever recorded as the biggest win by a ‘political system’. Hey they beat the Nazi’s totals of 1936. Sick!

10. The sad thing is I think Liu knew he was not able to run that night but because Chinese people have conspiracy theories worse than Americans, he HAD to come out, show himself and then bust up his foot for the ‘fans’ just so they ‘knew’ he really tried. Athletes at that level of fine tuned skill, know when they are not right.......they KNOW. So out he came, said ‘Watch me citizens of China’, and then zapped his foot.

And that, for me is the most heroic thing that has happened in sports in a long time. Damn stupid, but heroic nonetheless. I predict after suitable medical consideration Liu Xiang will retire.

Karl Lacroix

Baca Selengkapnya ....

Reason Number 25 - The Silence of Chinese Conservation

Posted by Unknown 0 komentar
‘Fault Lines On The Face Of China: 50 Reasons Why China May Never Be Great’ - Excerpt 47
"The River Yangtze is the third longest on the planet. It is approximately 6,300 km long and accounts for more than a third of China’s total freshwater supplies. It discharges more than a million million cubic meters of water into the sea annually. A river so huge, it might be thought, would be almost impossible to pollute heavily.

Yet according to the 2007 health report on this river (which, despite being billed as ‘annual’ by the Chinese government is the first of its kind) it is under major pressure. Around 10% of the Yangtze is in ‘critical condition,’ and 30% of its major tributaries are seriously polluted. According to Yang Guishan, a researcher at a department of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, the nation’s leading intellectual body, this impact is ‘largely irreversible.’ In 2006, the Yangtze fell to its lowest level since records began in 1877.

Every species that lives in the river is in decline, most dramatically the white-flag dolphin, or ‘Baiji,’ one of only five species of freshwater dolphin in the world.

A six week search for the white-flag along the river did not find a single dolphin, leading some researchers to conclude it is in fact extinct. If so, it will be the first time mankind has driven a cetacean to extinction.
"

China’s lack of concern for the environment is pretty shocking. There is almost no environmental activism at any level in society. The sector I am most familiar with, the highly-educated, are no exception.

Now these guys are environmentally aware. They have some idea how fucked-up China’s environment is (though they only know a mere fraction of the true situation) but they simply don’t care. I’ve never seen a student turn off the air conditioner after class, or turn off a light. Most dump their trash – food wrappers, drink bottles – on the floor and saunter out of the class uncaring.

For most of my stay in China, I’ve never seen a Chinese person take a used plastic bag to the store. When I go to the store, I take a plastic bag. And when I get it out at the till, most times the checkout operator and the people in the queue smile, or laugh – ‘Look at the funny foreigner!

I guess that’s slowly going to change now that Shanghai government compels stores to charge for plastic bags. The many years of ‘patriotic education’ – the slogans plastered everywhere exhorting people to ‘Love China’ and so on had precisely zero effect. There is very little sense of altruism in China; most everything is filtered through the lens of immediate personal benefit.

That’s why most Chinese people care nothing for the environment, but they do care to save a coin.

And that’s why China’s environment will continue to be raped, ravaged and exploited for the foreseeable future.

There’s money in it.


‘Fault Lines On The Face Of China: 50 Reasons Why China May Never Be Great’ - Excerpt 47
"It’s safe to say that the idea of “harmoniously coexisting with nature,” which China introduced in 2003 as a “new concept” is not working. One reason that the national government has such limited success in controlling pollution is that local governments do everything they can to keep the inspectors out.

For example, many local governments set up industrial parks which banned other government departments from conducting any inspections whatsoever without direct approval. This is why most of the hundred firms in one such industrial park in Henan Province did not install any pollution control equipment at all, and instead just dumped untreated waste into a local river.

Similar parks can be found in Anhui, Gansu and Zhejiang Provinces. All across China county governments collude with polluters to keep the money flowing into their pockets and the poison flowing into the environment."

China is still brutalizing Tibet, even as the Games are underway. Heavy-handed crackdowns, making sure no Tibetan voice is heard free and clear. So if you are in China and can be on camera, make a ‘T’ sign for Tibet and an X sign for Xinjiang.

Baca Selengkapnya ....

Reason Number 24 - Why am I Speaking English?

Posted by Unknown Rabu, 20 Agustus 2008 0 komentar
‘Fault Lines On The Face Of China: 50 Reasons Why China May Never Be Great’ - Excerpt 45
"Between the years 1978 and 2006 China allowed 1,067,000 of its young citizens to study abroad. More than 792,000 of those citizens never came home.

They never returned to ‘the motherland,’ and have never returned to be Chinese. Three out of four of those more than one million minds, full of new information, education and ideas, nation-building qualities, are still keeping the company of Western economies and living a Western lifestyle.

In the earlier years of this exodus, the most popular study designations were the US, Canada, Australia and the United Kingdom. But more recently many other countries have joined the list. New Zealand. Ireland. France. Germany. Italy. Spain. Austria. Even Russia and the Ukraine. It seems that almost any country is preferable to departing Chinese youth than China."


The exodus of students from China is indeed vast. And that’s largely commendable – Chinese university education being so shit, the only way to get a decent education is to leave China. And while overseas education does indeed change students, it is not perhaps as effective in doing so as it could be.

The reason for this is that Chinese students, on the whole, opt for an exceedingly narrow choice of study subjects. And the most single popular topic of study is greed. Greed, money, cash, capitalism, all that – students want to study accounting, business, finance, management… and, of course, MBA degrees. Anyone who studies an MBA degree is pretty much guaranteed to be a wanker, by the way.

Add to this a good proportion of students studying computer science (also perceived as a path to financial success) and a smaller (but much nobler) number aiming at medicine, and you pretty much cover the whole diaspora.

These students may well help boost China’s economy.

But where are the students who will help expand China’s soul?


‘Fault Lines On The Face Of China: 50 Reasons Why China May Never Be Great’ - Excerpt 46
"Nearly 80% of Chinese students – from primary age to undergraduates – list learning English as their top priority. One survey, said Chinese media, suggested that 56% of students not studying English majors spent ‘a large portion’ of their time on English, and another 19% spent almost all their time studying the language. All Chinese university students – no matter what they are studying – must pass English exams otherwise they cannot graduate. For many students, cramming to pass these exams is the single biggest burden on their time.

According to China International Business magazine, English is a ‘status symbol’ and can even be a factor in marriage. 'A man without a grasp of English is nearly paralyzed”'a young Chinese woman told the magazine, describing her requirements for a potential husband. 'It is obvious that a young man without a fair command of English won’t be able to climb up the social ladder.'

English can be viewed as a ‘virus’ in terms of the effect it is having on China. The combination of the internet and widespread ability to read English has created a democracy of communication in China. Government censorship of English-based websites is much less severe than Chinese-based websites – a ‘one internet, two systems’ culture. Yet China does not have a democracy in thought, since its government restricts the combination of free thinking and free expression among its people.

While the Party is remarkably efficient at controlling how people think and speak using the Chinese language, when it comes to English their control is severely limited. Knowledge of English allows Chinese citizens to escape the straitjacket of government control."



Perhaps knowledge of English might also help those Chinese citizens with an open mind read more widely about Tibet and Xinjiang and learn to see that these countries are indeed captive possessions of China. 'T' for Tibet and 'X' for Xinjiang.

Baca Selengkapnya ....

Reason Number 23 - Graying Reds

Posted by Unknown Selasa, 19 Agustus 2008 0 komentar
‘Fault Lines On The Face Of China: 50 Reasons Why China May Never Be Great’ - Excerpt 43
“China’s constant talk of a ‘peaceful rise’ and of ‘peaceful development’ is an attempt to create an image of a young and dynamic new economy. The astonishing growth of the country’s economy in recent years can make it appear like a strong economic youngster growing into powerful and confident world of developed countries.

Yet real Chinese society is gray, both in age and numbers. According to the World Health Organization, an ‘aging society’ is either one in which 10% of the population is over 60 years old or (in another measure) 7% of the population is over 65.

Nationwide, by the end of 2005, China had almost 144 million people over the age of 60, accounting for 11% of the entire population. The number of elderly people is rising fast, at 3% a year overall, with the number of those over 80 rising by 5% a year. By 2010, other estimates say China will have 174 million people over 60, more than 20 million of whom will be over 80.

By 2025, there will be 280 million people in China over the age of 60. By 2045, that number will have risen to 400 million. The average age in China, which was around 30 in 2000, will rise to 39 by 2025. By 2040 the average age will be 44, meaning the country will age faster in a generation than Europe has in a century. To put it another way, by 2050 average age will be three years higher than average lifespan was in 1950.”


Many of the commentators on this blog say that China is the coming nation. China is developing, they write – China is getting stronger every day. And that is a China I would like to see – strong, confident, just, capable and creative.

But how can that China ever come into existence when so many of its citizens are elderly, and when so many of its youth are taught to think and act like the elderly – conservative, inflexible, convinced they understand the world?

‘Fault Lines On The Face Of China: 50 Reasons Why China May Never Be Great’ - Excerpt 44
“China’s dilemma is that it will grow old before it grows rich. As the number of elderly continues to rise and China’s use of the one-child policy prevents an increase in younger people to support them, the situation will get exponentially worse.

By 2050, by some estimates the average lifespan will be an incredible 85 years old. This means many one of the one-child workers of the future will have to devote even more resources to supporting two retired parents and four retired grandparents. About 65% of the elderly population in rural areas receive no benefits from China’s social welfare system. By 2040, when China’s aged population will be at its peak, the country’s social security budget will have a shortfall of US$128 billion annually.

China’s government has plenty of bland pronouncements to make about its attitude towards the elderly. 'The State values and cherishes senior citizens for their knowledge, experience and skills, and respects them for their good ethical values. It thus makes vigorous efforts to create good conditions for senior citizens to bring into full play their expertise and capability, and gives them encouragement and support to integrate into society and continue to make contributions to the social development of China' said a recent white paper on the elderly from the Information Office of China’s State Council. But apart from mentioning current facts and figures – such as that the nation had only 20,000 professional nurses for the aged by the end of 2005, the 7,500 word document (released at the end of 2006) had almost nothing concrete to say about what needs to be done in the future.”


Still some days to go in the Olympics. The world's eyes remain on China. 'T' for Tibet and 'X' for Xinjiang.

Baca Selengkapnya ....

Reason Number 22 - Once the Masters of Invention

Posted by Unknown Senin, 18 Agustus 2008 0 komentar
‘Fault Lines On The Face Of China: 50 Reasons Why China May Never Be Great’ - Excerpt 41
"Any great nation needs to rely on creativity and innovation in order to leave its mark on history as well as to drive its economy. For China’s economic miracle to continue, it is imperative to re-discover its native sense of inventiveness, the same inventiveness that created China itself.

However, the country’s leaders know that a truly creative and free-thinking population will also be much more likely to demand innovation in politics as well as industry, meaning the Party remains wary of too much reform. Democracy is a great energizer of invention, but is a step too far for the present government.

Instead, the Party has sought to channel national innovation into paths that will bolster its own hold on power. Rather than allow any form of ‘blue skies’ thinking (that is, free and undirected scientific enquiry), the Party directs innovation and a huge amount of finance into politically impressive projects such as its space program. Whereas in the United States, cash and ingenuity results in creativity (as in the case of Microsoft, for example), in China the government’s money directs all things, which usually dampens the sparks of innovation."


So where is China’s inventive streak? The nation that gave the world the compass, paper, the printing press, gunpowder - what has it created in the last few hundred years?

I see that I got precisely zero answers to an earlier question, in which I asked how Taiwan could possibly 'part of China' be when it had its own laws and leaders. So I’ll try a simpler question.

Which of my nationalist Chinese readers can tell me what China has invented to make the world a better place in the last century or two?


‘Fault Lines On The Face Of China: 50 Reasons Why China May Never Be Great’ - Excerpt 42
China’s space program put the nation’s first man in space in 2003 (more than forty years after the Russians did it) and in 2005, Hu Shixiang, deputy chief commander of the space program, said China would put a man on the moon and build a space station within ten to 15 years.

Projects such as this contribute very little to the sum total of human wellbeing, and they certainly do not make the life of the average Chinese citizen any better – indeed, the life of the average Chinese citizen becomes worse given that billions of dollars poured into space projects becomes unavailable to provide the schools, hospitals and social welfare that rural China so desperately needs. This money also siphons off research funding for scientists who are working on projects of real benefit.

The space program unites the Chinese people with a feeling of pride, and it is this pride the Party uses to leverage its grip on power. Yet national self-esteem is only one aspect of China’s rush into space. China’s wish to put a man on the moon has perhaps more to do with Chinese desires for military expansion into space.

Sadly, the vast majority of Chinese people quickly smile and register self-satisfaction when the space race and the new arms-in-space race is brought up in general conversation. For them, the allocation of billions of dollars of research funds to vanity projects, when domestic matters require creative solutions to real problems, is totally acceptable.

And while China provides the biggest show of all, the Olympic games, still its captive colonies suffer. 'T' for Tibet and 'X' for Xinjiang, every chance you get.

Baca Selengkapnya ....

Reason Number 20 - Suicide China

Posted by Unknown Minggu, 17 Agustus 2008 0 komentar

‘Fault Lines On The Face Of China: 50 Reasons Why China May Never Be Great’ - Excerpt 39
Around 250,000 people kill themselves every year in China, according to statistics from China’s Ministry of Health. To put this another way – every two minutes of each hour, 24/7, eight Chinese people kill themselves. The figure of 250,000 is those whose deaths are reported as suicide. It does not include the suicide deaths that are hushed up or attributed to other causes.

A further two million people attempt suicide annually, according to statistics from 2003, the latest year for which information is available to us at the time of writing. Furthermore these two million attempts were just the ones that ended up in hospital, indicating a far higher true total.

Even more shocking, of these two million, “less than one percent receive psychiatric assessment and guidance during the emergency treatment” said Chinese media.

The suicide death toll among today’s Chinese citizens is beyond the ability of government officials to calculate accurately. According to the Beijing Suicide Research and Prevention Center, which was set up in 2003 by the Society of Neurology and Psychiatry of the Chinese Medical Association and Beijing’s Huilongguan Hospital, the figure is 23 suicides per 100,000 people. Based on an official population of 1.3 billion, that’s almost 300,000 suicides a year.

Suicide is the number one killer of Chinese people between the ages of 15 and 34. Surprising, when you consider the burgeoning economy and new-found ‘freedoms’ offered by the state that pronounces stability and harmony as its watchwords. In a country where young people have everything to live for, they are ending their lives at a rate that surely must make government leaders question the speed of change that is overtaking the Chinese people in the name of progress.


My only question here, to all those Chinese citizens leaving comments to defend China -- why is it that so many of your fellow citizens are killing themselves? If China is ‘getting better every day,’ why the huge death toll?



‘Fault Lines On The Face Of China: 50 Reasons Why China May Never Be Great’ - Excerpt 40
The suicide rate among women is 25% higher than among men, and rural suicide rates are three times higher than urban rates. The causes of suicide in rural areas tend to arise out of different factors, most commonly poverty and domestic abuse, with women suffering by far the most.

According to Xu Rong, who works with the Cultural Development Centre for Rural Women, “Most suicides in rural areas start with small quarrels between couples…Some of them are accidental; some are actually rooted in unhappy marriages.”

In China’s countryside, there is great pressure on young women to conform to society’s expectations of traditional marriage, meaning many arranged marriages.

Many marriages are not based on love, and, says Xu Rong, “Rural men tend to be reluctant to express their love or care for their spouses, who have more romantic emotions.”

One of the problems that Xu Rong’s organization faces is that it remains very small scale. She says that when the project began she faced criticism because people felt suicide was a “private issue.” Even though the project soon began to achieve good results, it only served six villages in three rural counties.

Acknowledging this problem, Liu Denggao, a vice-director at the Ministry of Agriculture, said his ministry would restrict production of the most poisonous insecticides, change the color and smell of poisons, package chemicals in small amounts, and educate the public about appropriate uses and storage of pesticides. He was speaking as a workshop on a National Suicide Prevention Plan for China in 2003.

In 2006, Xu Rong said it was still too easy for women to obtain pesticides, three years after the Ministry of Agriculture had said it would address the problem.

Lethal pesticides today are freely available off the shelf, are inappropriately stored in home environments, and this inexpensive answer to a moment’s anger or feeling of depression too readily is the answer taken.

Early in 2007, a young woman was preparing to kill herself in the central city of Chongqing. As she stood, ready to jump off a six-storey building, a crowd gathered below.

Some yelled for her to jump, and some phoned friends to “come and enjoy the spectacle.” Others were upset she had not jumped before the emergency services arrived to try and talk her down. One young man sat in the window of an opposite building playing his guitar to entertain the crowds. When the emergency services persuaded the woman to give up the attempt, the crowd below booed. The unfolding of tragedy before the eyes of many Chinese citizens is today viewed with a sense of pleasure.

‘T’ for Tibet and ‘X’ for Xinjiang. Make the signs every chance you get. Tibet and Xinjiang will one day regain the freedom China has taken from them!

Baca Selengkapnya ....

Reason Number 19 - Hegemony with Chinese Characteristics

Posted by Unknown Kamis, 14 Agustus 2008 0 komentar

‘Fault Lines On The Face Of China: 50 Reasons Why China May Never Be Great’ - Excerpt 37
In China, the ‘kowtow’ has long been the traditional form of obeisance on meeting the emperor. The ceremony involves crouching on one’s hands and knees and knocking the head against the floor, and a full performance of the ritual requires the giver to fall to his knees three times, each time knocking his head to the ground thrice.

Kowtowing to your immediate superior and those above theoretically ended when the Qing Dynasty fell in 1911. Occasionally you will see staff members at various hotels genuflect with less formality and depth, indicating a sense of the past still lives in China.

The idea that China is still the center of the world has reappeared in subtle ways, although perhaps subtlety is not the correct term to use when considering China’s approach to Taiwan – which is unification by any means, with force if necessary.

Today China has reached back into its traditions to create the ‘Taiwan kowtow,’ a kowtow with politics added to it, easily the one overriding political idea that consumes Chinese political cadres, as well as the public.

It appears that every single country’s leaders, freely elected or not, must mouth the golden words of the new Taiwan kowtow.


ChinaBounder comments:

Poor old Taiwan.


Taiwan is an example of what China could be. Taiwan, in its 36,000 square kilometers, has a hundred times more greatness in it than China does in its near ten million square kilometers.

In just 50 years Taiwan achieved what China, in 2000 years, never managed. Democracy. Freedom. A voice for the people!

Taiwan is to be honored. Taiwan, proud, strong independent. It is a great nation.

And it is most emphatically not part of China.

Now I’ve asked this question a thousand times and I’ve not yet met the Chinese citizen who is able to give me a coherent, logical answer.

The people of Taiwan choose their own leaders. Their own law. They have their own currency. Their own passport. In every yardstick by which a nation can be defined, Taiwan is a nation.

China, for all its childish huffing and puffing, has precisely zero control over Taiwan – save, of course, the only thing that Chinese politicians really understand – the threat of force. That’s all China’s got. That’s China’s one claim to Taiwan – be part of us or we will obliterate you to the last man woman and child.

And so by what measure, I ask my Chinese readers, can you claim Taiwan is part of China?

Now first of all, you can fuck off with your historical bullshit claims. History means precisely shit, and I have hashed this over so many times with indoctrinated Chinese people that I now am simply abrupt about it. Fuck history. It does not matter. Even if the ludicrous claims that Taiwan has ‘always’ been part of China were true, even if it could be proved Taiwan’s been part of China since the Han Dynasty it would matter precisely nothing. (And in any case, the truth is that China paid no attention at all to Taiwan for much of its history. There was a brief incursion in the early Qing, but even by the late Qing the government of China stated ‘Taiwan is beyond our dominions.’)

Because today is what matters. Right now is what matters. Right now China has zero control over Taiwan. And right now Taiwan has zero interest in coming back to China.

Indeed I guarantee – I guarantee – that there is not one single young Taiwanese citizen who wants the nation to be part of China. Not one.

And that’s the equation. It’s what the Taiwanese want today that matters.

I ask my Chinese readers: Why should the Taiwanese people be bound by ‘history’? Even if your preposterous version of history were true, why should the destiny of today’s Taiwanese people be decided by the actions of generations long dead? Why do they not have the right to choose their own path?

The only people who use ‘history’ as an argument are those who have no other argument to make.

It’s just the same with Tibet, guys. What matters is now. What matters is what the people who live in Taiwan and Tibet (and Xinjiang and Inner Mongolia, those other nations China holds by force) want now.

And by fuck they don’t want to be part of China.

Of course one gets used to lies and bluster from China. That’s the way of it, and there are a dozen examples everywhere you look – as, for example, John Ray found out the other day. He’s a BBC journalist. He was in China, doing his job, reporting on activists from a group called ‘Students for a Free Tibet.’ The Chinese police, who were beating seven bells of shit out of these guys, as is fully to be expected, also had a crack at Mr. Ray, dragging him away, bundling him into a van, and forcibly restraining him there.

China, when it won the right to hold the Olympic games, said it would respect media freedom. That was, of course, a lie. When will the world realize it can expect little but lies from China’s leaders?


And so the lies and shit over Taiwan that spew from China are no real surprise, and nor is the ignorance of young Chinese people regarding Taiwan.

The real injustice here (for one cannot expect justice from China) is how the rest of the world treats Taiwan. Taiwan’s achievement in reaching democracy should be honored. It is magnificent. It is a triumph of the human spirit, and the people of Taiwan deserve the highest respect and praise for sticking to their democracy in the face of their thuggish and belligerent neighbor China.

Do they get that respect? Do they fuck. Most of the rest of the world has proven happy to turn its back on Taiwan, to pay lip-service to the objectionable twaddle of ‘One China,’ to fleer and jest at what Taiwan has achieved. The order of the day is ‘Fuck Taiwan’s democracy, keep the criminals in Beijing happy, for that’s where the money is.’ Yeah, when it comes to money, where are the West’s fine morals?

And yet despite all that, Taiwan remains proud. Taiwan remains strong. Taiwan remains a nation.

Good for the nation of Taiwan!


‘Fault Lines On The Face Of China: 50 Reasons Why China May Never Be Great’ - Excerpt 38
In April 2007, Chinese Vice President Zeng Qinghong met Germany’s Defense Minister, Franz Josef Jung, in Beijing. Jung said Germany would adhere to the one-China policy.

Perhaps Defense Minister Jung forgot that Germany’s reunification was accomplished by democracy, something at this point that only Taiwan has accomplished.

Again that month, Chinese Vice-Premier Hui Liangyu met the Dutch Foreign Minister, Maxime Verhagen, in The Hague. During the meeting, Verhagen reiterated the Dutch government’s continued adherence to the one-China policy.

In May 2007 Wu Bangguo, one of China’s most senior leaders, was in Warsaw, Poland, to discuss relations between the two countries and to collect the prerequisite Taiwan kowtow, meeting the speaker of the Polish parliament’s lower house, Ludwik Dorn

Dorn said that Poland’s position on the issues of Taiwan and Tibet will never change and that the Polish government and its people firmly oppose any secessionist activities in any forms.

A remarkable statement from a leader in a nation that suffered so much at the hands of so many totalitarian occupiers throughout its history. Poland only found its freedom through the democratic Solidarity movement which allowed it to break away from a communist regime and form a free nation – similar to some of Taiwan’s democratic intentions.

Foreign Minister Yang Jiechi was again busy in this month, visiting his Canadian counterpart Peter Mackay. Foreign Minister Mackay said that the Canadian government would stick to the one-China policy and would not develop official ties with Taiwan.

While mouthing the required Party line kept his guests happy, perhaps Foreign Minister Mackay’s political party also gained votes from the vast number of Chinese who have made Canada their new home – unless of course some of their reasons for moving to Canada were to escape Chinese communism.

Soon after his election, French Prime Minister Nicolas Sarkozy spoke with Chinese President Hu Jintao. Sarkozy said that Taiwan is an indispensable part of China, and France would firmly adhere to the one-China policy.

France’s famous national motto is ‘Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité – ‘Liberty, Equality, Fraternity.’

But not for Taiwan.


Taiwan has fought for and found its freedom. But Tibet and Xinjiang are still fighting. Don’t forget the fight. Whenever you get the chance to be on camera in China, make a ‘T’ sign for Tibet and an ‘X’ sign for Xinjiang. One day those nations will be as free from China as Taiwan already is.

Baca Selengkapnya ....

Reason Number 18. The Mirror of Japan - The War of Apology

Posted by Unknown Rabu, 13 Agustus 2008 0 komentar
‘Fault Lines On The Face Of China: 50 Reasons Why China May Never Be Great’ - Excerpt 35
“Despite the signing of the 1972 ‘Joint Communiqué of the Government of Japan and the Government of the People’s Republic of China’ which normalized relations between the two countries, for China, the ‘Chinese People’s War of Resistance against Japanese Aggression,’ as the China-Japan war of 1937 to 1945 is called in China, has never truly come to an emotional closure. When China looks in the mirror of Japan, it sees an enemy, a country with which it is still fighting a war of apology.

And the one constant refrain of this emotional war is that Japan must ‘truthfully face up to history.’ The youth of Japan are declared ignorant about the need for reflection, and the youth of China therefore reflect only hatred.

How deep Chinese hatred of Japan goes was made clear in an editorial in People’s Daily in June 2007. Li Xuejiang, the newspaper’s chief resident reporter in the US, wrote that “The massacre of the Jews by the German Nazis during WWII was a trampling upon the human justice, and the issue about ‘sex slaves’ is an identical one and has no reason whatsoever to make it fade or weaken” [sic].

To equate one of the greatest tragedies in all human history – the Holocaust – with sex slavery, which, though a grave crime, is one that has been committed in almost every war ever fought – is simply obscene, and a deep insult to all Jewish people as well as many other nationals who suffered the horrors of the gas.

In making a link between the Japanese nation of today with Nazi Germany of the past, China simply distorts history and keeps hatred alive.”


ChinaBounder comments:

Ah, Japan. The one thing, above even Tibet and Xinjiang, which is guaranteed to provoke anger and misunderstanding from China.

Japan shows that just like many Chinese people don’t really understand the truth inside China, they don’t understand the truth outside China either.

I’ve written about Japan before, two years ago. In the time since then there has been a tiny glimmer recognition within the Communist Party that the policy it has held ever since the Tiananmen Square Massacre, of blaming Japan for everything, may be unwise. The force of nationalism, once created, is hard to kill. But this is a faint spark indeed, for Japan remains a whipping boy too tempting to ignore. And so the drumbeat of hate for Japan continues to sound, creating an endless supply of angry Chinese nationalists.

I really don’t think people who have never visited China have any understanding of just how deep this hatred runs. It’s not present in all people, not by a long way. But it’s certainly a significant part of life in China today.

The hatred that wells out of China in response to Japan is an ugly thing. I’ve met it in people who are otherwise calm and rational, and in people who are highly educated.

But one incident more than any other sticks in my mind.

It took place, naturally, in the classroom, for it is in the classroom that I have really learned the mind of modern China. It was a class of younger students, around 17 to 19 years old, and at the time I was working for one of the many private language schools in Shanghai rather than a university. A few of the students were keen to work, but most were rather lazy– they were that new breed of young Chinese student, the idle rich. Offspring of newly-wealthy parents, they had never had to want for anything, never had to do much work.

Most of them were too idle, too lazy, to get a good score in the all-important college entrance exam, and so their parents had sent them here to brush up on English before paying hefty amounts of money to have them educated overseas. For most of them, the outlay would have been a waste of time, since for sure these guys would not work any harder abroad than at home – but as few had the gumption to work hard enough to learn the language skills, it was a moot point. They’d never get the visa to leave China.

Anyhow, there was one chap, a rather conceited fellow, who spend most of the class slumped on the table asleep (though of course that could have just been because I was a shit teacher.) Generally I don’t let students do this – I give ‘em the old ‘If you want to be in my class, you have to pay attention’ routine. But it hadn’t worked with him.

One session, I got to talking about Japan, and attitudes in China to that nation. This particular student was, as usual, slumped on his desk. I asked the student next to him, ‘What do you think of Japan?’

This question obviously penetrated the fog of the sleeping guy’s oblivion, for he sat bolt upright, stated ‘I hate Japan. We should kill all Japanese. I want to kill them!’

And, that said, he settled his head back into his folded arms and slept out the rest of the lesson.

That’s what I think of when I think of China and Japan. Because while you can’t extrapolate a whole nation from a single individual, every individual carries something of the nation inside.

What Japan did to China was indeed a grave sin against humanity.

But often I think there are many young people in China who would love the chance to visit those same horrors on Japan.

‘Fault Lines On The Face Of China: 50 Reasons Why China May Never Be Great’ - Excerpt 36
“Giving a speech in September 2005 to mark the 60th anniversary of Japan’s surrender at the end of World War Two, Chinese President Hu Jintao said that ‘After the end of the war, many Japanese from all walks of life faced squarely the historical fact that Japanese militarists had launched the war of aggression against foreign countries and strongly denounced the atrocities Japanese aggressors had committed in China. Their conscience and courage are highly commendable.’

But the words do not stop there. Hu goes on to say that there are ‘…forces in Japan that have categorically denied the aggressive nature of the war Japan launched against China and the crimes it committed, and have tried their best to whitewash its militarist aggression and call back the spirit of those Class A war criminals who have been condemned by history.’

It is true that there are those in Japan who downplay or even extol its wartime past. Yet these are a minority voice, and a regrettable but unavoidable side-effect of living in a democratic nation. When citizens are allowed to voice their opinions freely, some of those opinions will be objectionable. But, short of direct hate speech, such freedoms must be honored. This is something China, in its War of Apology, and without democracy, simply cannot understand.

‘The past, if not forgotten, can serve as a guide for the future,’ said Hu. ‘By emphasizing the need to always remember the past, we do not mean to continue the hatred. Instead, we want to draw lessons from history and be forward-looking. Only by remembering the past and drawing lessons from it can one avoid the repetition of historical tragedies.’

But in what must rank as one of the most breathtakingly false, mendacious and hypocritical statements ever issued by any world leader, Hu said ‘History has eloquently proved that only when it adheres to the leadership of the CPC and the socialist road with Chinese characteristics can the Chinese nation create a brighter future.’

Exhaustive and meticulous research by Professor R. J. Rummel, Professor Emeritus of Political Science, University of Hawaii, suggests that between its founding in 1949 and 1987, the government of the People’s Republic of China was responsible for the death of more than 75 million of its own citizens.

75 million.

This is the leadership that, says Hu, history ‘eloquently’ proves leads to a ‘brighter future.’

The failings of the CPC are not open to inspection, like the failings of other governments in other powerful nations. To replace this inspection process, China showers blame on what it views at excesses from outside its borders.

Hatred should be based on facts, not half-truths, rumors and misinterpretations of historical conflict, now only teachable by history books written by the citizens of each country, each book containing prejudices the other country will never accept. Teaching children how they should act in future may be more valid than teaching them how they should be guided by historical mythology.”


What Japan did to China, China has done the peoples of its colonized territories. Don't forget - if you're on camera in China, make a 'T' for Tibet and an 'X' for Xinjiang.

Baca Selengkapnya ....

Reason Number 17 - Faux Pop-Culture

Posted by Unknown Selasa, 12 Agustus 2008 0 komentar
‘Fault Lines On The Face Of China: 50 Reasons Why China May Never Be Great’ - Excerpt 33
“Mando-pop (Mandarin pop music) is characterized by softness. No hard edges are exposed where young people might cut themselves some independent thinking. No difficult subject matter interferes with the music from mesmerizing young minds.

The typical male mando-pop star is a designed metrosexual. Reasonably good looking, his hair, never long, is designed to gently fracture his face, the eyes possibly kohl shadowed. It is permissible to unbutton the shirt exposing an oiled, or sparkled hairless chest. Wiry thin, dressed in dark tones or blinding bright colors, the male mando-pop star whispers his song, never yelling, at least until the penultimate moment when all the girls will have their hearts stolen as the music in its crescendo closing requires our star to give it all he has.

In the audience hearts and glow sticks are all a flutter. One, possibly two well-mannered girls jump up on stage with bouquets of flowers. Our male star offers his cheek which the two girls shyly kiss, to the orgasmic cheer of the audience. Glow sticks flutter double time.

For the typical mando-pop female star, perfect in her makeup, dress and hair must be wistful, wishful and virginal. No sex allowed. That is reserved for Japanese, Korean, and Taiwanese pop stars. If she can produce a tear, not during the song but when her adoring fans shriek her name through their glow sticks, a tear that she wipes away ever so gently with a single finger, then her concert will be considered a smash.

The songs are soft, breathy love ballads, almost spoken, and with the one essential quality that guarantees their success – they can be sung by anyone.

It is in the KTV parlors that a mando-pop’s star quality is manufactured. Hundreds of thousands of locations throughout China require the latest superstar efforts to be available for local singing fans, 15 to 25 years old, to duplicate the sounds of their favorites. If you can sell your songs to the KTV palaces, you are ensured stardom.

The kids can’t sing rock ‘n roll, so don’t bother making it. It’s just too Western for sensitive Chinese ears. And rock n’ roll just might tell the kids something they do not even want to hear.”

ChinaBounder comments:

So already that spectacular Olympic opening show is unraveling. The ‘firework footprint’ was faked, a hash-up of computer graphics – though to be fair it was totally obvious it was computer generated when it was played, and I am surprised anyone thought it would pass for real.

But today it was revealed that the little girl who gave a solo song was faking it too. This girl, Lin Miaoke, was a last-minute replacement for Yang Peiyi. Yang, it was planned, would sing the song live; and indeed the song that the world heard was sung by Yang. But Yang did not make it to the stage because – get this – her teeth were too crooked. And those crooked teeth apparently were a threat to China’s national dignity.

According to Chen Qigang, who was the music designer for the show, Yang was chosen for her perfect voice. But then some cocksucker from the Poltiburo came down “who gave us his opinion: It must change.”

China has changed - that’s what I’m often told. I say bollocks to that. China’s change is only superficial. All the shit surrounding the Olympics – the waste of money, the press-ganged thousands of performers, the poor thrown out of their homes and the rural workers thrown out of the city – the chest-beating, the boasting, the sheer mendacity of it. It’s all straight out of the CPC fuck-humanity copy book.

After all, what is this episode of insufficiently cute Yang Peiyi but the same old shit as no-longer-liked leaders being airbrushed out of photos?

Yang is seven years old. Imagine what a lifelong memory appearing in the opening ceremony would have been for her. And imagine what a memory it will be for her now. Imagine how she’ll feel about it.

This is more than just a story of China faking it to live up to some fairytale image of itself, a past that has been mythologized beyond far beyond reality. In fact it’s fucking despicable – Yang Peiyi has, in effect, been told that she looks so unattractive that she’d bring shame to her whole nation.

When China’s leaders can do that kind of shit to China’s children, how much of a fuck do you think they give for the rest of China’s citizens?

‘Fault Lines On The Face Of China: 50 Reasons Why China May Never Be Great’ - Excerpt 34
“While young Chinese people are fascinated with overseas culture, that culture is most often presented to them in a highly controlled fashion – Western Culture with Chinese Characteristics. It is a simplified, sanitized version of Western culture, with anything thought-provoking or challenging scrubbed out.

The huge success of the US TV show ‘American Idol’ led Chinese TV to invent its own version of the show, which it called ‘Super Girl’ (or, to give it its full name, ‘Mongolian Cow Sour Yogurt Super Girl Contest.’) Aired in 2005, this proved extremely popular, with more than 400 million people watching the final episode. The show, in all practical terms, copied the American production.

However, in 2007, the State Administration of Radio, Film and Television (SARFT) issued ‘a list of rules to uphold high moral standards on a sequel.’ These rules said that the show ‘should include only “healthy and ethically inspiring” songs and try to avoid “gossip” about the contestants and scenes of fans screaming and wailing, or losing contestants in tears.’ In other words, less emotionally American.

The censors also ordered the title of the show to be changed, banning use of the word ‘super’ along with ‘girl’ (it became ‘Happy Boys’ Voice’ instead), restricted its running time to six weeks, and ‘decreed their hairstyles, clothes, fashion accessories, language and manners should be in line with the mainstream values.’ There was to be ‘No weirdness, no vulgarity, no low taste,’ and contestants from outside China were banned. Once again, Chinese culture was copying the West, yet Party bosses were dictating that culture should be a pale shadow of ‘Chinese characteristics.’

While Chinese people today are consumed by Western culture, the culture they actually receive is thus very carefully controlled. Chinese society appropriates Western culture without actually understanding what it means, sometimes producing a Western culture with Chinese characteristics / Chinese culture with Western characteristics hybrid.

Sadly, it is not only Chinese understanding of Western culture that is weak. It is now becoming true that Chinese people’s understanding of Chinese culture is also weakening. Young people tend to follow their peers in the chase to be popular. What is popular now in China has virtually nothing to do with Chinese history, traditions or culture. The result is a pseudo-culture environment leading eventually to a huge generation gap between children and their parents larger than anything that has ever existed in the West."


Remember that under all the fakery and manipulation that China has poured into the Olympics, its colonies still suffer. 'T' for Tibet and 'X' for Xinjiang.

Baca Selengkapnya ....
Trik SEO Terbaru support Online Shop Baju Wanita - Original design by Bamz | Copyright of hot fashion editors.